Categories
Documents Insights Photos

Mintchine contribution to the Jewish Theatre of Berlin

Newspaper clipping in Russian from 1925 showing Mintchine and one of the costumes he designed for the Berlin Jewish Theater

Abraham Mintchine lived in Berlin between 1923 and 1925. This corresponds to a period during which there was great artistic and cultural ferment in the German capital. Mintchine took part in the then vibrant artistic community which included Expressionist as well as New Objectivity painters, writers, poets and filmmakers. Here Mintchine had an exhibition which reportedly showed 47 artworks in the Avant-Garde style. Unfortunately, none of these artworks have been identified even until today. It is in Berlin that, in contact with other German painters, young Abraham progresses toward figurative art. This would eventually bring him to repudiate his Russian years and make deep impressions, in a figurative style for which he is mostly known nowadays, in the Ecole de Paris circle.

Mintchine closely collaborated with the Jewish Theatre of Berlin

Newspaper frontpage in Yiddish from 1924, showing a scenography that Mintchine designed for the Berlin Jewish Theater.
Costume designed by Abraham Mintchine for the Jewish theater
Newspaper clipping in Yiddish showing a costume Mintchine designed for the Berlin Jewish Theater

However, during this Berlin period Mintchine also closely collaborated with the Jewish Theatre of Berlin. Also known as the “Jüdisches Kulturbund Theater” or the “Jüdisches Theater Berlin,” it was a theatre company established in Berlin, Germany, during the 1920s. It was founded in 1924 and operated until 1938, when it was forcibly closed by the Nazis as part of their anti-Semitic policies.

Newspaper clipping in German showing two costumes Mintchine designed for the Berlin Jewish Theater
Newspaper clipping in Russian showing costumes Mintchine designed for the Berlin Jewish Theater

During its brief existence, the Jewish Theatre of Berlin played an important role in the cultural life of the Jewish community in Berlin, providing a platform for Jewish artists and performers who were otherwise marginalised or excluded from mainstream theatres due to anti-Semitic restrictions. The theatre staged productions of plays, operas, and other performances that reflected the Jewish cultural heritage and addressed contemporary social and political issues.

Acknowledgment for reception of 16 costume drawings from the drama Belsaza (Belsazar?) by the organizers of the “Storm” exhibition at the international theater exhibition of the city of Vienna (1924).

In 1924 and 1925, the Jewish Theatre of Berlin would have been in its early years, establishing itself as a cultural institution within the Jewish community in Berlin. It would have faced challenges and restrictions imposed by anti-Semitic laws and policies of the time, including censorship, financial difficulties, and social discrimination. However, despite these challenges, the theatre managed to stage productions and provide a platform for Jewish artists and performers to express themselves and contribute to the rich cultural tapestry of Berlin.

The fate of the Jewish Theatre of Berlin changed dramatically after the rise of the Nazis to power in 1933

Mintchine collaborated with the Jewish Theatre of Berlin, designing various costumes and helping to refine scenographies. Lately, a number of documents, pictures of costumes and scenes, as well as newspaper articles highlighting these collaborations, have been rediscovered by Sarah Edelson. These are published by the society for the first time and we heartily thank Sarah for bringing them to light.

“Abraham Mintchine” by Max Osborn (1870-1946; prominent German art critic, journalist, and prolific author). Text in German.

It’s important to note that the fate of the Jewish Theatre of Berlin changed dramatically after the rise of the Nazis to power in 1933. In 1938, as part of the systematic persecution of Jews in Nazi Germany, the theatre was forcibly closed, and many of its members were arrested or forced to flee the country. The theatre’s closure marked a dark chapter in the history of Jewish culture in Berlin and a tragic loss to the artistic and cultural landscape of the city.

Categories
Analysis Documents Insights

Chil Aronson: Mintchine and Social-Realism

Chil Aronson was a journalis and art critic. The following biographical article, first published in Paris in 1963 in “Scenes et Visages de Montparnasse” offers a first-hand account of Mintchine’s life. It is interesting to note that among the many qualities he highlights, Chil Aronson see Mintchne as a herald of Social-Realism. Reading this article, one can only be touched by the words of the author, written more than 30 years after Mintchine’s passing.

Abraham Mintchine’s Tragic Fate

Mintchine was thirty years old when he left us. He is unforgettable and I often think of him. His thin and slender figure and his pale face always worried me. His atelier was in an old two-storied house in 83 rue de la Glaciere. The pitiful room where he lived was a sharp contrast to his bright paintings.

He invited me to his place to paint my portrait. At eight o’clock he was already standing by his easel painting spontaneously – seemingly in a trance. After I sat for him five times he was still unhappy with the result, and ripped the canvas to pieces. Then in twenty minutes he made a small portrait of me – a masterpiece.

The pitiful room where he lived was a sharp contrast to his bright paintings

It was a time of abject indigence, yet Mintchine did not stop painting even for a minute. Once, when he was utterly penniless, he asked me to sell one of his paintings, a beautiful still life. I asked 200 francs for it but could not find a buyer. Two years later he exhibited with two wonderful painters, Blond and Bart, at the Alice Manteau Gallery. Two young critics, who thought him a brilliant colorist, lavished unrestrained praise on him. In the wake of this success the Alice Manteau Gallery signed a year’s contract
with him and put on an exhibition of his works in Brussels. Mintchine’s greatest pleasure was painting, which he lived to enjoy for only a very few years.

Table in front of the window, 61x50cm, oil on canvas,MIN135

He was born in 1898 in Kiev and worked for a goldsmith. During Petlyura’s persecutions he suffered from hunger and contracted tuberculosis, which eventually brought about his death at such an early age. His good friend, the well-known painter Andre Favory, said that when he saw Mintchine working from sunrise to sunset he thought that at the bottom of his heart Minchine must have known that his days were numbered.

In 1923 Mintchine left Russia, went to Berlin, and stayed there for two years. There he staged an exhibition of his works, that were in the Cubist style. From Berlin he went to Paris and won recognition from the talented members of the School of Paris.

As early as in the 20s, Mintchine was one of the heralds of Social-Realism

In the 1934 exhibition, alongside his typical portraits, wonderful works were displayed – sights of Paris. Solid, clear comprehensible paintings. How refined are the surfaces. He succeeded in creating a stirring unity, a pinkish harmony. And he displayed so much love to the working man in his works. I, who have seen so many of his outstanding paintings depicting porters and destitute people, believe that as early as in the 20s Mintchine was one of the heralds of Social-Realism, which was manifest in the Salon d’Automne in the 50s. The scenes featuring the laborers were executed in extraordinary pictorial means, and were full of light. Unfortunately, most of these paintings are in private collections, not only in Paris, but also in Belgium, the USA, Ireland and Switzerland. I would have liked to collect all of them and display them in an exhibition containing these great works.

Worksite in Paris, 54x81cm, Oil on canvas, MIN173

What we have here is a remarkable colorist, a poet of nature, of life. He succeeded in intimately interlacing music with painting. How majestic is the combination between sky, sea and boats in his seascapes. What keen observation of reality, what innocent, naive observation, reflecting his outlook on the world. Mintchine liked especially pink and red shades which were often used for his colorful harmonies. Particularly beautiful are his still lifes. Their colors are soul-stirring and flooded with light. It is true that Mintchine liked to create harmonies in shades of red, but the greens in his landscapes and the fluid browns, yellows and whitish colors are intensive and deep.

Mintchine is a painter of life, a poet of the working people, of sunlit seascapes, of life in the harbors, with boats sailing in the horizon. He is a poet of youth, of blossoms. His friend, the painter Andre Favory said that his portrait painted by Mintchine illuminated his room as if it was an original Van Gogh.

Mintchine is a painter of life, a poet of the working people, of sunlit seascapes, of life in the harbors, with boats sailing in the horizon

In the last six years of his life Minrchine’ s career was utterly changed, and on one warm morning in 1931, in the village of St. Margaret, Mintchine sat painting in the field, in the landscape, when he felt faint and collapsed. Workers brought him to a small fishermen’s cafe, and when his wife arrived with the doctor, he was pronounced dead. In the last landscape he painted, the sky is especially red and the cypresses are upright as if they are offering a prayer.

Chil Aronson, Scenes et Visages de Montparnasse, Paris 1963

Seaport, 65x100cm, Oil on canvas, MIN330
Categories
Documents Insights

On the nature of Mintchine: insights from André Favory

André Favory was a french painter (1888-1937) who in his day was much admired by critics (including Louis Vauxcelles). His works were exhibited in numerous galleries in Paris and Brussels, as well as London, Amsterdam, New York and Tokyo. His artwork is conserved in various museums, including the Centre Pompidou.

André Favory final years were blighted by a crippling illness which eventually would prevent him from painting (a watercolour of Favory from Mintchine, seems to show him ailing). Favory met Mintchine when the latter decided to travel to South of France in order to discover new landscapes in 1930.

André Favory, Autoportrait a la femme blonde, 101×74.5cm, oil on canvas, 1924
Credit: Centre Pompidou

In the letter that follows, Favory recounts in it his experience at the side of Abraham Mintchine. It has been written in 1931 following the death of Mintchine. The letter was initially published in Mintchine’s first catalogue raisonné (Massimo Di Veroli and Giovanni Testori, 1981, Ed.Giorgio Mondadori). We publish it here translated from French, online for the first time.

Original letter from Favory (in French)

In memory of Mintchine

I will never forget the evening I met Mintchine for the first time. We were just about at the end of our evening meal, in the olive grove, when an agile, timidly inconsequential young man with the head of an angel appeared in the garden. This was Mintchine. He had been sent to me by Fels, who had recommended La Cadiere as a good place for painters.

The fellow-feeling between us was immediate. We arranged to meet the next day, agreeing that we should devote our time to visiting landscape themes. Our wanderings astonished Mintchine, who was seeing Provence for the first time, and he was straight away captivated by it.

The unfolding of his sensitivity showed itself romantically in the picture and watching the work develop was pure joy

We decided to work together. I was able, personally, to note the lyrical excitement which Mintchine was prey to. I watched him going about his daily work, which was quite considerable. A frantic ardour often forced him into three sessions in one day. He seemed to be deeply conscious of the fact that he was alive for but a fleeting hour.

Abraham Mintchine, Landscape in Cagnes, oil on canvas, 100x81cm (ref: MIN006)

His canvases showed tremendous progress. He assimilated the landscape in a truly marvellous fashion. On days when laziness got the better of me, I would spend whole afternoons watching him work. I liked watching him work immensely because his canvases genuinely took on the value of a birth. The unfolding of his sensitivity showed itself romantically in the picture and watching the work develop was pure joy.

He seemed to be deeply conscious of the fact that he was alive for but a fleeting hour

These daily exchanges formed the building bricks of a solid, virile friendship. I learned to know him better and love him deeply, and we became very close. We worked side by side for two months. We painted each other’s portraits. And now I am truly happy to possess a picture of myself which, hanging in my studio as it does, is as resplendent as a van Gogh. This canvas has an inestimable value for me, both artistically and sentimentally. The autumn then drove us back to Paris where we continued to see each other frequently.

The news of his death, here in Provence which he loved so much, has caused me great sorrow and heart-rending grief. The Archangel has returned to that heaven where, as so often in his pictures, he used to paint his peers, the angels. I weep for a great painter, man and friend.

André Favory